I answered correctly this morning to the one who signed “Amazement” naming her mother the beneficiary of her husband’s estate, which left her with $20,000 in insurance and some furniture on the one hand, but also $38,000 in accumulated debt.
Asking him to consult his notary and accountant before refusing the succession was in itself a good thing. But another way is possible. If his mother is specifically named as the beneficiary of the $20,000 insurance, that amount is no longer part of the estate. Therefore, it can exclude this advantage on the one hand and reject the caliphate on the other hand.
On the other hand, if there is no beneficiary specifically specified in the insurance contract, then the insurance product is then part of the estate, and thus the beneficiaries are the legal heirs. In this case, since the succession is in incapacity, it will be necessary either to reject the succession, or to consider a proposal to the creditors. But to be on the safe side, she should consult an insolvency advisor.
VB
Since I have minimal information on this issue, I pass on your advice to it as a whole, in the hope that it will benefit you.
“Music guru. Incurable web practitioner. Thinker. Lifelong zombie junkie. Tv buff. Typical organizer. Evil beer scholar.”
More Stories
After the discovery of norovirus, these berries should not be eaten.
Mechanics Strike | WestJet Cancels Nearly 700 Flights, Affects Nearly 100,000 Passengers
Three 'basic' Airbnb listings: Owner shares how he easily skirted the rules